Date: August 29, 2008
To: Governor Smith
From: Caly Lebel
Subject: A Pharmacist’s Right of Refusal
After doing research, I find the most effective solution would be to give pharmacists the right to refuse, but within limits. If a pharmacist is strongly against dispensing emergency contraception, then he/she should quickly arrange for another pharmacist to fill the prescription. The needs of the patient, especially in such a time framed situation, must come first. Also, to avoid problems, pharmacies that have emergency contraception in stock should make sure that there is at least one pharmacist who can willingly fill such prescriptions working at all times.
One problem that may arise with this decision is that despite refusing to fill the prescription, pharmacists may still feel that they are going against their morals by referring the patient elsewhere for their need. They may feel that they are still helping the patient with something that they are strongly against. Another problem may be that the patient has no way to get to another pharmacist within the time needed.
I strongly recommend this policy to limit a pharmacist’s right to objection, despite the problems that may arise. Any decision that is made will be accompanied by disagreement and controversy when living in a purple state with a diverse population, who has many opposing opinions. This policy will not only be beneficial, but it will cause the least amount of problems.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss the policy further, please feel free to contact me.

No comments:
Post a Comment